A Pocket Herbal with Plant Specimen for the Intrepid Field Scientist, 1545
One of the most popular and widely reprinted herbals of the sixteenth century, this copy of Leonhart Fuchs’s famous botanical work was designed not so much for beauty as for eminently practical use in the field for gathering, studying, and comparing samples as they were encountered in nature. Its woodcuts, engraved by Heinrich Füllmaurer and Veit Rudolf Speckle from drawings rendered by Albrecht Meyer, provide the essential tools of real-life observation. Unlike earlier, and indeed many contemporary, herbals that sometimes simply reused the same woodblocks as stand-in approximations of the shapes of multiple different plants, Fuchs insisted upon uniquely carved, hyper-detailed individual woodblocks for each specimen he studied.
Alongside these engraved images of well-known and well-documented medicinal plants, in this volume we see an abundance of marginal notes in both French and Latin, and apparently in multiple hands. These “field-note” annotations appear across much of the present volume and extend even to variations on the preliminary printed alphabetical index of plant names. In the best ancient tradition of Theophrastus and Dioscorides, the printed pages and manuscript notes throughout this volume focus on the medicinal properties of plants as practical materia medica suited to multiple nutritional and pharmacological applications. On top of all of the rich content added through verbal annotations, the reader of this copy also finds, across several of its black-and-white woodcuts, partially hand-colored flower petals in hues of red and blue, and greens upon some leaves. Most remarkable of all in this hard-working copy of Fuchs is the subtly preserved shadow of an actual organic sample that had formerly been pressed between two pages. Its elements closely mirror the facing illustration of a water dropwort (oenanthe)—a plant that grows in wet, marshy environments.
Leonhart Fuchs, one of the “fathers” of botany—along with his German contemporaries Hieronymus Bock and Otto Brunfels—expanded and updated classical traditions of natural history, such as those of Pliny the Elder and Dioscorides, with textual and visual catalogues of hundreds of known plants native to Europe. The significance of his contributions to botanical knowledge was perhaps best memorialized by a later French botanist, Charles Plumier, whose work took him to several expeditions in the West Indies in search of exotic plant species. In his book Nova plantarum Americanum (1703), Plumier honored Fuchs by naming a spectacularly colored plant after him, the bright purple-red-petaled “Fuchsia triphylla”—whose name is the source of the color term “fuschia” that is used up to the present day.
—Kelsey Champagne, Earle Havens
Bibliography
Brent Elliott, “The World of the Renaissance Herbal,” Renaissance Studies 25:1 (February 2011), 24–41; Sachiko Kusukawa, “Leonhart Fuchs on the Importance of Pictures,” Journal of the History of Ideas 58:3 (July 1997), 403–27; Alain Touwaide, “Botany and Humanism in the Renaissance: Background, Interaction, Contradictions,” Studies in the History of Art 69 (2008): esp. 45–54; Alessandro Tosi, “Botanical Illustrations and the Idea of the Garden in the Sixteenth Century Between Imitation and Imagination,” in Hubertus Fischer et al. (eds.), Gardens, Knowledge and the Sciences in the Early Modern Period (Springer, 2016), esp.191–98.